<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/templates/2k11/rss.xsl" media="screen" ?>
<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    
    <title>The Fuzzing Project - Comments</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/</link>
    <description>The Fuzzing Project - Blog and Advisories</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 2.6.0 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 11:18:45 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>William A Rowe Jr: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c1007</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (William A Rowe Jr)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Noel is correct with respect to blocking OPTIONS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The other reason that blocking OPTIONS is no solution is that the corruption itself in the shared startup configuration list of supported methods still occurs on any request which parses the suspect .htaccess file (where an unrecognized method is given by accident or deliberately.) Corrupting that shared configuration data will still lead to unpredictable behavior. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 17:30:37 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c1007</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Noel Whitemore: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c1006</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Noel Whitemore)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    That particular module is still termed &quot;experimental&quot; and there&#039;s no mention in the official documentation of what the expected output should be, so you&#039;d probably have to look at the source code to see what&#039;s going on behind the scenes. On a separate issue,  deliberately limiting the OPTIONS method in the normal way (as Google appears to be doing) doesn&#039;t work because when you send a request to Google&#039;s servers you get the &quot;HTTP/1.1 405 Method Not Allowed&quot; message but the accepted methods are still listed on the next line of the header. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:25:24 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c1006</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Hayden James: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c1004</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Hayden James)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    cPanel has released update for this via easyapache. Esp for shared hosting using cPanel/WHM you should update asap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--------------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SUMMARY&lt;br /&gt;
cPanel, Inc. has released updated RPMs for EasyApache 4 and EasyApache 3.34.17 on September 20, 2017, with a patched versions of Apache 2.2 and 2.4 to address the optionsbleed vulnerability related to CVE-2017-9798. We strongly encourage all Apache 2.2 and 2.4 users to upgrade their system and obtain the patch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AFFECTED VERSIONS&lt;br /&gt;
All versions of Apache 2.4 through 2.4.27&lt;br /&gt;
All versions of Apache 2.2 through 2.2.34&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SECURITY RATING&lt;br /&gt;
The National Vulnerability Database (NIST) has given the following severity ratings to these CVEs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CVE-2017-9798 - HIGH&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apache 2.4.27-8&lt;br /&gt;
Patched optionsbleed vulnerability related to CVE-2017-9798&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apache 2.2.34&lt;br /&gt;
Patched optionsbleed vulnerability related to CVE-2017-9798&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SOLUTION&lt;br /&gt;
cPanel, Inc. has released EasyApache 3.34.17 with updated versions of Apache 2.2 and Apache 2.4. Unless you have disabled EasyApache updates, the EasyApache application updates to the latest version when launched. Run EasyApache to rebuild your profile with the latest version of Apache.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
cPanel, Inc. has released updated RPMs for EasyApache 4 on September 20, 2017, with an updated versions of Apache 2.4. Unless you have enabled automatic RPM updates in your cron, update your system with either yum update or WHM&#039;s Run System Update interface. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:36:04 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c1004</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>William A Rowe Jr: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c1001</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (William A Rowe Jr)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    (The eaten .htaccess example I offered was...)&lt;br /&gt;
-LT- Limit POST DELETE TWO -GT- 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 16:36:53 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c1001</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>William A Rowe Jr: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c1000</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (William A Rowe Jr)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Note that the new Apache directive RegisterHttpMethod lets you pre-define unusual method strings to avoid this defect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in the httpd.conf global/startup config;&lt;br /&gt;
RegisterHttpMethod ONE TWO THREE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in the .htaccess files;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
or similar. If you grant untrusted users .htaccess editing permission, you are always opening up the possibility of malicious configuration. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 16:35:09 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c1000</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Colin Watson: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c999</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Colin Watson)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I&#039;ve just deployed the fix for the minor launchpad.net bug identified as part of this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(I wonder if I&#039;m the only one who thinks &quot;hmm, bug report from Hanno; I wonder what interesting widespread problem they&#039;re researching&quot;?) 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:45:26 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c999</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>JoeRandomHacker: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c998</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (JoeRandomHacker)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    No, this is only about apache httpd, not about other projects of the apache foundation like tomcat. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:11:47 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c998</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Manju: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c994</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Manju)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Does this vulnerability affects Apache Tomcat 8.5 versions? 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 04:57:28 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c994</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>JoeRandomHacker: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c991</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (JoeRandomHacker)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    RewriteEngine On&lt;br /&gt;
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} !(GET|POST)&lt;br /&gt;
RewriteRule .* - [F] 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:05:53 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c991</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Jordan: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c990</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Jordan)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    So, if I don&#039;t use the Limit directive in an htaccess file, then I&#039;m safe from this? Is it really that commonly used? What about if it&#039;s in the global configuration? 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:21:54 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c990</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Sawood Alam: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c989</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Sawood Alam)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I have noted this issue in 2014 while I was working on my paper, &quot;Support for Various HTTP Methods on the Web&quot; (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.2330.pdf). My observations about this issue as well as some other problems are described in the section  5.3 of the paper. However, I didn&#039;t look into it from the security perspective at that time. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 06:14:06 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c989</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Lee: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c988</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Lee)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Good article. Thanks! You may want to fix a few mistakes I found while reading it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, ASAN doesn&#039;t work &quot;reliable&quot;... &gt; reliably&lt;br /&gt;
...so not all vulnerable hosts may have been &quot;catched&quot;... &gt; caught&lt;br /&gt;
... you should drop everything &quot;you do now&quot;... &gt; you are doing now 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 04:36:15 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c988</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>parseword: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c987</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (parseword)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    For those who can reproduce, if you don&#039;t mind testing, I&#039;m curious whether blocking the OPTIONS verb via mod_allowmethods works as a temporary mitigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In httpd.conf:&lt;br /&gt;
    LoadModule allowmethods_module modules/mod_allowmethods.so&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Inside your Directory stanzas:&lt;br /&gt;
    #Disable unwanted methods (OPTIONS, PUT, PROPFIND, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
    AllowMethods GET POST HEAD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This should cause any OPTIONS request to return a status of &quot;HTTP/1.1 405 Method Not Allowed&quot; and emit an empty &quot;Allow:&quot; header. I can&#039;t reproduce the bug on any of my instances to ensure this properly scrubs the &quot;Allow:&quot; header, though. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 03:26:32 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c987</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>easteregg: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c986</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (easteregg)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    same with 2.4.25-3+deb9u2 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:00:52 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c986</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>lbiegaj: Optionsbleed - HTTP OPTIONS method can leak Apache's server memory</title>
    <link>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#c985</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-Optionsbleed-HTTP-OPTIONS-method-can-leak-Apaches-server-memory.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/wfwcomment.php?cid=60</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (lbiegaj)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Seems that this blog filtered out &quot;LIMIT GET&quot; tags from my comment. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:33:44 +0200</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.fuzzing-project.org/60-guid.html#c985</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
